Enter Google Fiber. While much has been promised and little delivered so far, the initiative is bold enough that it just might lead to real disruption in the industry. For a one-time $300 installation fee, any home in the targeted Kansas City area could have unlimited 5 Mb/s Internet - a speed just at or slightly below the entire U.S. average, depending on which year your data is drawn from. And though Fiber's 1 Gb/s offering is enticing, the $70-per-month price tag is the truly revolutionary part: Comcast's and AT&T's most cost-efficient service options were 20 Mb/s for $29.99 and $19.95 for 6 Mb/s monthly respectively. Quick division yields $1.50 per Mb/s every month for a Comcast subscription, and $3.32 per Mb/s with AT&T. To contrast, a paid Fiber Internet subscription of $70 for 1 Gb/s will run a user $0.07 per Mb/s. Those are some crazy numbers.
Here's the catch: Google - like the local contenders - must deploy its expensive infrastructure, and that takes time, money, and support. To maximize construction efficiency and ensure a profitable venture, they're wisely deploying only in neighborhoods that have enough subscribers. However, registration to become fiber-enabled is only available to residents of the Kansas City region.
Now imagine that Google provides people outside Kansas City the ability to make non-refundable investments (i.e., money would be lost if Fiber fails) in some affordable dollar range and receive a proportional discount on their first year or so of paid Fiber subscription. Essentially, give the rest of us the power to be Google's angel investors. The win-win scenario is evident:
- Google receives a welcome boost of income from readily-available resources during this critical, experimental phase of the project's life
- Enthusiasts get to personally advance the project toward nationwide deployment while receiving a discount when expansion comes
- Google's financial department can more accurately gauge interest and potential future subscriptions
- Google has ultimately accumulated no extra risk should the initiative fall flat